Important NMFC changes coming July 19, 2025. The NMFTA will consolidate ~2,000 commodity listings in the first phase of the 2025-1 docket. Learn more or contact your sales rep.
Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) and Freight Collect are two distinct concepts in business operations that aim to optimize costs but address different aspects of supply chain management. EOQ focuses on minimizing inventory-related expenses by determining the ideal order quantity, while Freight Collect pertains to payment terms for transportation services, where the buyer pays shipping fees upon delivery. Comparing these models provides insights into how businesses can strategically manage resources across procurement and logistics.
The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) is a mathematical model that calculates the optimal quantity of inventory to order, balancing ordering costs and holding costs. It minimizes total inventory expenses by identifying the point where additional orders no longer reduce overall costs.
Developed by Ford W. Harris in 1913, EOQ revolutionized inventory management by providing a data-driven approach to reduce waste and excess stock. It remains foundational in supply chain optimization for industries like manufacturing, retail, and e-commerce.
Freight Collect refers to a shipping arrangement where the buyer (consignee) pays transportation costs directly upon delivery. Unlike prepaid shipping (where the seller absorbs costs upfront), Freight Collect shifts financial responsibility to the buyer.
Originating in early trade practices, Freight Collect gained traction with global e-commerce growth. It’s favored by businesses requiring tight control over delivery times (e.g., perishables) or seeking transparent shipping costs.
| Aspect | Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) | Freight Collect | |----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Focus | Minimizes inventory ordering and holding costs. | Controls transportation payment terms and logistics. | | Application Context | Procurement/inventory management | Shipping and logistics operations | | Cost Structure | Balances ordering (setup) vs. holding (storage/maintenance). | Shifts shipping fees to buyer; impacts cash flow, not inventory costs.| | Decision Criteria | Demand rate, ordering cost, holding cost | Delivery urgency, payment terms, transportation reliability | | Responsibility | Buyer/seller manages inventory decisions | Buyer pays shipping fees directly |
Advantages
Disadvantages
Advantages
Disadvantages
| Need | Choose EOQ | Choose Freight Collect | |-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------| | Reduce inventory costs | Yes (optimize order frequency/size) | No (addresses shipping, not stockholding) | | Control delivery logistics | No (logistics handled by seller) | Yes (buyer manages carrier terms/timeframes) |
EOQ and Freight Collect serve complementary roles in cost optimization. While EOQ streamlines inventory management, Freight Collect empowers buyers to control shipping economics. Businesses should adopt both models based on operational priorities—inventory efficiency for EOQ and logistical agility for Freight Collect.