Important Update: Our Rules & Tariff changed on May 1, 2025. Learn more about the updates.

    Free Alongside Ship (FAS) vs Cost and Freight: A Comprehensive Comparison

    Introduction

    In international trade, understanding the nuances of Incoterms is crucial for effective logistics management. This comparison explores two key terms: FAS (Free Alongside Ship) and CFR (Cost and Freight). Both define responsibilities and risks between buyers and sellers, but differ in how they handle loading, risk transfer, and costs.

    What is Free Alongside Ship (FAS)?

    Definition: FAS requires the seller to deliver goods alongside a ship at the port of shipment. The buyer then arranges for loading onto the vessel.

    Key Characteristics:

    • Responsibility Transfer: Risk transfers once goods are alongside the ship.
    • Buyer's Responsibilities: Loading, insurance, and unloading at destination.
    • Seller's Responsibilities: Delivers to the quay or wharf but doesn't load.

    History & Importance: FAS emerged from older trade practices where sellers delivered goods near ships. It’s useful when buyers want control over loading, ensuring timely vessel boarding.

    What is Cost and Freight (CFR)?

    Definition: CFR mandates the seller arrange for carriage via sea or inland waterway to the destination port, paying freight costs.

    Key Characteristics:

    • Responsibility Transfer: Risk transfers once goods are loaded on board.
    • Seller's Responsibilities: Arranges transportation and pays freight; delivers on board at origin port.
    • Buyer's Responsibilities: Insurance from loading onwards.

    History & Importance: CFR streamlines logistics by having the seller handle carriage, beneficial for sellers with established shipping networks. It’s essential when sellers prefer managing transportation to ensure timely delivery.

    Key Differences

    1. Loading Responsibility:

      • FAS: Buyer loads goods onto the vessel.
      • CFR: Seller arranges and pays for carriage, including loading.
    2. Risk Transfer Point:

      • FAS: Risk transfers once goods are alongside the ship.
      • CFR: Risk transfers upon loading on board at origin port.
    3. Cost Allocation:

      • FAS: Buyer covers all costs post-delivery (loading, insurance, unloading).
      • CFR: Seller pays carriage and freight; buyer handles insurance.
    4. Documentation:

      • FAS: Minimal seller involvement beyond delivery alongside.
      • CFR: Seller ensures goods are properly documented for transport.
    5. Insurance Management:

      • FAS: Buyer arranges insurance from delivery point.
      • CFR: Buyer insures from loading onwards, excluding carriage risks covered by seller.

    Use Cases

    • FAS: Ideal when buyers control their logistics or prefer managing loading. Suitable for small exporters without ship-loading capacity.

    • CFR: Benefits sellers with established shipping networks, allowing them to manage transportation efficiently. Useful for larger companies seeking streamlined logistics.

    Advantages and Disadvantages

    FAS:

    • Advantages: Reduces seller’s liability; buyer controls loading timing.
    • Disadvantages: Buyer assumes more risk and costs; potential delays if not ready to load.

    CFR:

    • Advantages: Clear roles with seller handling carriage, reducing buyer’s complexity.
    • Disadvantages: Higher costs for sellers; excludes insurance coverage.

    Popular Examples

    • FAS Example: A small exporter delivers goods alongside a ship, relying on the importer to load and arrange insurance. This ensures timely vessel boarding without seller involvement beyond delivery.

    • CFR Example: A larger company uses CFR to manage transportation directly, ensuring goods reach the destination port efficiently, while the buyer handles insurance post-loading.

    Making the Right Choice

    Choosing between FAS and CFR depends on several factors:

    • Control Over Loading: Use FAS if you want control; use CFR if you prefer the seller handle it.
    • Risk Management: FAS transfers risk earlier; CFR later once loaded.
    • Cost Structure: Consider who bears carriage costs (seller in CFR) versus buyer’s loading and insurance costs (FAS).
    • Insurance Needs: Ensure alignment with your risk tolerance regarding insurance coverage.

    Conclusion

    Understanding FAS and CFR is vital for optimizing international trade logistics. FAS suits those wanting control over loading, while CFR benefits sellers managing transportation. The choice hinges on specific business needs, logistics capabilities, and risk management strategies.