Important NMFC changes coming July 19, 2025. The NMFTA will consolidate ~2,000 commodity listings in the first phase of the 2025-1 docket. Learn more or contact your sales rep.
In the modern logistics landscape, businesses face diverse challenges in delivering goods efficiently. Two distinct approaches—On-Demand Delivery and Free Alongside Ship (FAS)—address these needs in fundamentally different ways. While On-Demand Delivery revolutionizes last-mile delivery with speed and flexibility, FAS streamlines international trade by clarifying responsibilities at the port. Comparing these models provides insights into optimizing logistics strategies for varying business objectives.
On-Demand Delivery refers to a service model where customers receive goods or services immediately upon request—often within hours. This concept gained traction with the rise of e-commerce and gig economy platforms like Uber Eats, Amazon Prime Now, and Instacart.
Emerging in the early 2000s with food delivery apps, On-Demand Delivery now spans retail, healthcare, and groceries. Its growth aligns with consumer demand for instant gratification and the rise of digital platforms enabling efficient last-mile logistics. Critical for businesses competing on customer experience.
Free Alongside Ship (FAS) is an Incoterms 2020 rule defining that the seller delivers goods to a port and places them alongside the ship, ready for loading. The seller bears transportation costs up to this point; the buyer assumes responsibility thereafter.
Originating in maritime trade, FAS clarifies obligations in international agreements. It’s essential for bulk imports/exporting manufacturers needing control over post-port logistics.
| Aspect | On-Demand Delivery | Free Alongside Ship (FAS) |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Primary Focus | Last-mile, immediate customer needs | International bulk shipping logistics |
| Speed | Same-day/next-day delivery | Weeks/months for global transit |
| Responsibility Transfer| Seller handles until final delivery | Buyer assumes risk at the port |
| Cost Structure | Premium pricing for urgency | Buyer absorbs post-port costs (customs, insurance) |
| Scope of Operation | Local/regional markets | Global trade with bulk shipments |
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
On-Demand Delivery and FAS cater to distinct logistical needs—speed vs. structured international trade. By aligning each model with business objectives, companies can optimize efficiency, reduce risks, and meet evolving customer expectations in an interconnected global economy.